Friday, March 28, 2008
We're doing it. Sort of. Maybe.
We've reached a new agreement in the the W household. We are, potentially, going to try to have another baby. That's right...Mr. W has agreed. Sort of. As of now, we are going to consider using a gestational surrogate to have another child. Of course, we each had to compromise on this. Mr. W has insisted that our GS has to be someone that we know -- we will not use an agency or classified ads to find someone. In theory I agree with this, however I also know that this is likely going to be the sticking point that prevents the whole thing from working. Primarily because I just don't know how to ask someone out of the blue if they would let us knock them up. But, assuming that this can be done, Mr. W is on board. He is content to have just one child, so for him it isn't a big deal if a transfer were to be unsuccessful. He wanted to do just one transfer, but I felt like if we were going to do one, we had to do two. Basically, I think we've agreed to one fresh and one frozen cycle. However, that's not a guarantee. If the first cycle were to be successful, we would not do the second cycle. If the first and second were unsuccessful, we would be done -- there will be no third try. Mr. W also decided that he does not want to donate any unused embryos -- he couldn't handle the thought of someone else with our genetic child. He also has qualms with donating them for research (it's complicated but boils down to something about a slippery slope of creating embryos specifically for research and how far those develop before being tested, etc...I don't get it, I just agreed since this was a sticking point). In that same vein, he wants to transfer no more than 2 embryos per cycle since we really don't want to parent higher order multiples should all of them implant. Now...any ideas as to how to find someone that we already know who has already had a child, is under the age of 35, has no history of pregnancy complications, and who would be willing to carry a baby (or possibly 2) for me? How would all of you handle that type of situation? How would you approach someone? It's funny...it's sort of like we're moving forward on this one, but with the first limitation...it really might not be. I've got the benefit of being both hopeful and hopeless.
[
posted
@
3:32 PM
]
[ ]
[
View Comments (4) ]
[ E-mail this Post ]
Friday, March 14, 2008
Oh! My! Damn!
Wow...just...wow.
So, you all know that the mister and I have been on different pages in regards to ever having more children. Last week, while in Connecticut, he said to a co-worker who complimented our beautiful and well-behaved child (hahahahaha -- she caught us on a good day!) that he didn't think we'd have another one any time soon but that he was sure we would at some point. He smiled and said, "I'm sure she'll talk me into it."
Later that evening he said that if it weren't for the fact that our families would never speak to us again if we put them through the whole high-risk pregnancy followed by serious NICU time another time that maybe the discussion would be different.
So...I kind of sent a message to an RE with the general history of my four pregnancies, the outcomes, the vertical incision c-section. And today he answered my questions. He said that while he wouldn't tell me I couldn't have another successful pregnancy nor that I wouldn't carry as far or farther than I did with the lowercase, he also felt that a gestational carrier would be a very viable option and one that would present the lowest risk for all involved.
And of course we have insurance now that covers IVF procedures and meds. The only thing it wouldn't cover is the fee to pay a carrier -- that's some serious cash that we just don't have -- and her medical expenses.
But assuming we can find a volunteer and her insurance would cover the bills on her side without any surrogacy exclusions...
Then maybe, just maybe, we could have another baby (or two).
[
posted
@
11:28 PM
]
[ ]
[
View Comments (1) ]
[ E-mail this Post ]
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
How is this possible?
I know that I am much heavier than I was before the lowercase was born. The scale regularly tells me that I am 35 lbs above my normal weight. None of my pre-pregnancy clothes fit me. I get that I'm heavier. What I don't get is how the new jeans I bought last week can be a size 6 and yet I still have a BMI that is considered "overweight." According to the lovely BMI chart at Weight Watchers, I need to lose 10 more pounds just to hit the top end of the healthy range. Mind you, these are pounds I want to lose. Hell, I want to lose all 35 of the pounds I've put on since I got pregnant nearly 3 years ago! My problem is that a body wearing a size 6 shouldn't be overweight. Growing up, a size 6 was THIN. I distinctly remember envying the girls who were a natural size 5 or 6 all through high school.* Has vanity sizing really gotten so bad? What gives? And if it isn't in the sizing of the clothes, is the concept of body mass index the culprit? Because something is seriously wrong with this picture. *I was a size 10 in 8th grade. And then came the disordered eating leading to a weight range of 82 to 98 lbs. It continued through college -- I weighed 88 lbs the day I met my husband 10 years ago. I finally got healthy, stayed around 110-115 and wore a size 4 instead of the size 2 jeans that were too big for me on that day in 1998. Obviously, I have a lot of issues with body image, weight and clothing sizes...hell...numbers in general as they relate to my body.
[
posted
@
1:34 PM
]
[ ]
[
View Comments (1) ]
[ E-mail this Post ]
Better late than never
The last few weeks of our lives have been nothing short of crazy. I started this post 2 weeks ago and completely forgot about it until I sat down to write about our trip to Connecticut last week. That post will come tomorrow. Or, if this week is anything like the last 2...next month ;) Mr. W had his last day of work. The lowercase and I joined him for the afternoon. And, of course, since we were going to work, he had to take his laptop -- just like his daddy. Congratulations, Daddy!
[
posted
@
10:34 AM
]
[ ]
[
View Comments (1) ]
[ E-mail this Post ]
|